This whole argument is moot because there IS a free g.729
implementation. Actually it is a zero cost license to the
source code. Exactly what was asked for.
VoiceAge has a 1 port development use only windblows library out there, which is absolutely no good for Asterisk.
So, this argument is completely valid.
Jeremy McNamara
--- Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Witold Krecicki wrote:
1st. - I'm from Poland, we don't have (yet, and hopefully forever)software
patents. Is there any free g.729.1 implementation for asterisk? I want to useit for my
private use (dialing into inet->PSTN gateway), and I don't want(now) to buy
codec, as I don't know if I will be using this service in future(now I just
want to test it). Any solutions? Maybe even free-15day-trial ofg.729.1
codec?There *are* no software patents on G.729. However, there are a lot of
signal processing patents, and they are applicable everywhere. A lot
of people seem to have the strange idea that implementing a patented techique on a CPU, instead of some other hardware, suddenly makes it
not a patent issue in many countries. WRONG! As long as the original
patent was not so narrow that is was only claimed to apply to a very
specific realisation of the technique, a software implementation is just as patent encumbered as any other.
Regards, Steve
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
