Hi friend, I am running asterisk in production and it is being used by many people using h323. I cannot afford to change all their configurations. Also, the newer asterisk dosenot support inband for h323 properly. Thats why I want two asterisks one for backward compatibility and one for sip which I want to implement.
With warm regards. Vivek J. Joshi. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trikon electronics Pvt. Ltd. --New opinions often appear first as jokes and fancies, then as blasphemies and treason, then as questions open to discussion, and finally as established truths. Joseph Tanner wrote: > You could run a virtual machine. I'd try xen, uml, and vmware in that > order (vmware would be the easiest/quickest to setup, but is more of a > resource-hog than xen or uml). Assign a separate ip to the virtual > server, setup asterisk, and you're all set. > > BTW, just curious but why can't you run one asterisk install with both > h323 and sip? It'd simplify things and use less resources than > running a virtual server, assuming it works for you. > > Another idea, if one's solely for h323 and the other's solely for sip > (neither will be running both), then you could compile asterisk twice, > using different directories for each install. I don't think this > would work if both needed to use the same ports. I'm guessing you > want to bridge the h323 asterisk to the sip asterisk? If not, but you > do want to use sip on both, perhaps you can use port 5060 on one and > 5061 for the other. Couldn't bridge them, but both could talk to the > outside world (that is, maybe they could, I haven't tried this and do > not know what's involved). Running one in a virtual server is > probably going to be the easiest way to get two asterisk processes to > coexist on the same physical server. > > Joseph Tanner > > On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello friends, > > Can I run two asterisks running simultaneously on the same machine? I > > want one to run v1.0.2 for h323 ( which is an old and running production > > system ) and one for sip implementation. I wonder how it can be done since > > they will want access to the same ports and ip addresses. > > Does anyone know to do this or has done this before? > > Please share your experiences please. > > > > > > > > > > > > With warm regards. > > > > Vivek J. Joshi. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Trikon electronics Pvt. Ltd. > > > > --New opinions often appear first as jokes and fancies, then as blasphemies > > and treason, then as questions open to discussion, and finally as > > established truths. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
