I've seen a lot of IP501 and I've never seen one with a power jack.
According to Polycom they all use the cable.  

Possibly it was an IP500? -Mike

Michael Crown
Managing Partner
www.thevoipconnection.com
321.989.6728 ext. 611
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Garstang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:13 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 power over ethernet
> 
> No, some IP 501's have the inline cable and some have the power jack.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Hales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 8:59 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 power over ethernet
> 
> 
> 
> The IP300/301 has the power jack, the IP500/501 the inline cable.
> 
> PaulH
> 
> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 20:56 -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote:
> > Not true. Some do and some don't. Some have a place to plug 
> a separate DC adapter, and some have the inline power, where 
> the adapter plugs into the ethernet cable. Not sure which 
> ones are newer, and which are older.
> > 
> >     -----Original Message----- 
> >     From: Michael Welter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >     Sent: Sun 3/5/2006 6:50 PM 
> >     To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
> >     Cc: 
> >     Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 501 power over ethernet
> >     
> >     
> > 
> >     The IP501 does not have a power jack.  You'll need one 
> of the Polycom
> >     cables.
> >     
> >     William M Conlon wrote:
> >     > My recollection of the marketing fluff was that we 
> would just use our
> >     > legacy network (cables) and the devices at both ends 
> would figure out
> >     > whether they were sourcing, sinking, or neither.  In 
> the case of the
> >     > 501, it's the special Polycom cable, either with or 
> without provision
> >     > for an AC power adapter, that powers the phone.  
> That's what I meant by
> >     > saying the '501' itself is not compliant with 802.3af 
> -- it needs a
> >     > separate thingamajig [tech jargon :)]to be powered.
> >     >
> >     > Anyway I had hoped that I could just plug a CAT-5 
> patch cable from my
> >     > RJ45 wall outlet into the phone.
> >     >
> >     > On Mar 5, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Michael Welter wrote:
> >     >
> >     >> As I understand 802.3af, the phones go through a 
> negotiation with the
> >     >> unit supplying the power.  I don't think it's a 
> matter of -48VDC on a
> >     >> particular pair.  I remember a schematic from years 
> ago--it had each
> >     >> of the receive pair and the transmit pair going into 
> a transformer
> >     >> winding,  and that winding had a center tap for PoE. 
>  This is not
> >     >> something that *I* am going to screw with.
> >     >>
> >     >> The IP501 telephone set is the same for both PoE and 
> local power. 
> >     >> With the PoE cable, the 802.3af electronics (the 
> negotiator) is a
> >     >> plastic thing in the cable.  For the local power, 
> there is a plastic
> >     >> thingie toward the wall end of the cable, and you 
> plug the wall wart
> >     >> into the plastic thingie.  <Notice the advanced 
> technical jargon here>
> >     >>
> >     >> With local power, there is still only one cable one 
> the desk--the
> >     >> power plugs into the cable towards the wall.  Except 
> for a power
> >     >> interruption, this has all the advantages of PoE.
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> William M Conlon wrote:
> >     >>> I saw that Polycom offered a cable (not stocked 
> anywhere), at $40 a
> >     >>> pop for 802.3af connections.  That's what made me 
> think the phone
> >     >>> itself is NOT 802.3af compliant.
> >     >>> Presumably, for $40, there's more than a fuse in 
> that special cable.
> >     >>> On Mar 5, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Paul Hales wrote:
> >     >>>> For Polycom IP500/501's and IP300/301's you need a 
> special polycom POE
> >     >>>> cable.
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> When you buy Polycom phones you can usually 
> specify POE or powerpack.
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> PaulH
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 16:23 -0800, William M Conlon wrote:
> >     >>>>> When I bought two Polycom 501 SIP phones, I 
> naively thought they were
> >     >>>>> Power-over-Ethernet (IEEE 802.3af) because they 
> were "powered over
> >     >>>>> ethernet."  Silly me.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Polycom must have some odd voltage or funny way 
> of injecting the
> >     >>>>> power, because the POE switch I bought for them 
> (Netgear [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >     >>>>> won't power them, though if I use the 
> Polycom-supplied AC adapter and
> >     >>>>> ethernet power injector cable, they work with the 
> switch in either
> >     >>>>> its powered or unpowered ports.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Anyhow, I hadn't seen any mention of how people 
> power these phones,
> >     >>>>> as I had planned on centralizing phone power on a 
> UPS to supply my
> >     >>>>> Asterisk server and POE switch.  Now the question is:
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Can the Polycom AC-powered injector be used with 
> a standard ethernet
> >     >>>>> patch cable:
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>     switch :: Polycom injector cable :: RJ45 
> coupler :: patch cable ::
> >     >>>>> Polycom 501
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> which would allow me to power the Polycom AC 
> adapters by my UPS.  Or
> >     >>>>> do I need to provide a UPS at each phone and run 
> the ethernet like
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>     switch :: patch cable :: RJ45 coupler :: 
> Polycom injector cable ::
> >     >>>>> Polycom 501
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> thanks.
> >     >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     >>>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     >>>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     >>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     >>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     >>> Bill
> >     >>> William M. Conlon, P.E., Ph.D.
> >     >>> To the Point
> >     >>> 345 California Avenue Suite 2
> >     >>> Palo Alto, CA 94306
> >     >>>    vox:  650.327.2175 (direct)
> >     >>>    fax:  650.329.8335
> >     >>> mobile:  650.906.9929
> >     >>> e-mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     >>>    web:  http://www.tothept.com
> >     >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     >>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     >>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     >>
> >     >> --Michael Welter
> >     >> Telecom Matters Corp.
> >     >> Denver, Colorado US
> >     >> +1.303.414.4980
> >     >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     >> www.TelecomMatters.net
> >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     >>
> >     >> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     >>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     >
> >     > Bill
> >     >
> >     > William M. Conlon, P.E., Ph.D.
> >     > To the Point
> >     > 345 California Avenue Suite 2
> >     > Palo Alto, CA 94306
> >     >    vox:  650.327.2175 (direct)
> >     >    fax:  650.329.8335
> >     > mobile:  650.906.9929
> >     > e-mail:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     >    web:  http://www.tothept.com
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     >
> >     > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     >
> >     >
> >     
> >     --
> >     Michael Welter
> >     Telecom Matters Corp.
> >     Denver, Colorado US
> >     +1.303.414.4980
> >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     www.TelecomMatters.net
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >     
> >     Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >     To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >        http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >     
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> > 
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> 
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to