I'd wager that would depended on whether you were in front of a state judge or a federal one...
In general, I think no. I think the smaller the government body, the more restrictive it can be. Unless directly contradicted by a federal law, anyway. Bob McDowell -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:27 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT call recording (was stop monitor on transfer) Martin Joseph wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Bob McDowell wrote: > >> >> It depends.... >> >> http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law-america.htm >> > Thanks for the info! > > 12 states require, under most circumstances, the consent of all > parties to a conversation. Those jurisdictions are California, > Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, > Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. > Do Federal rules trump state rules? _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
