Seems to me that it's more logical for the phones to know what their
SRV records are than the server. You shouldn't rely on the dns to
ensure that your system is redundant.
Aaron
On Mar 16, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
I know someone who's at VON this week. Apparently Mark Spencer was
up there talking about how Asterisk supports SRV. Sounds like
vaporware to me.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Feedback from VON expo! Info on * HA
and
Polycomphone!!
In regards to HA...
SER is definitely a good option, but it does require the extra
hardware to have at least 2 boxes that can failover on each other. I
would user OpenSER however (better documentation and mor features).
I couldn't agree more that Asterisk should FULLY support DNS-SRV. The
solution seems to work great for phones and ATA's. This would be a
good item to create a bounty for.
I have only two boxes right now, so it seems like my only HA options
are the dreaded DUNDi setup or a active/passive failover with
linux-HA.
David
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
