The reason I say they are not the best is because they have no ability to
connect to a STUN server and they have no keep-alive mechanism for NAT.
At VON, I was talking to a company called Ranch Networks who said they have
a device that will solve NAT traversal issues with Asterisk and its phones.
Here is a link to their product:
http://www.ranchnetworks.com/pdfs/RN40_41_brief.pdf
I am talking to them now to see exactly what this thing does.
- Gabe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Marcus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there
isnoaudiowhen calling between extensions
C F wrote:
Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.
Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect multiple
offices?
Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a
NAT device, and the phones are only being used for normal calling?
Thanks,
--
Charles
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
