But with the same 128 bit upstream circuit, directly connecting the SJPhone the Stun server and using ulaw, everything is perfect. The problem comes when i am putting Asterisk in the picture.
On 3/25/06, Martin Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:19 PM, George Vagenas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following problem, working with a SIP provider, if i setup
> my SJPhone to register directly to their STUN server and working over
> a 384/128 ADSL i have a really good quality, but then if i configure
> Asterisk to register to the same provider over the same 384/128
> circuit the quality is REALLY BAD. The obvious difference is that
> using directly the SJPhone i am using STUN, while when i am using
> Asterisk to connect to my SIP provider and the SJPhone to connect to
> Asterisk i have the following configuration for Asterisk.
>
>
> register => user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [mysip]
> host=sip.provider.com
> type=peer
> qualify=yes
> username=user
> secret=pass
> nat=yes
> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
>
>
> I am using Asterisk 1.2.3.
>
> I think that i am missing something or misconfigure something because
> for sure its not matter of the ADSL since in both tests i am doing i
> am using the same circuit.
>
> Any idea please????
I don't think using ulaw on a 128K bit upstream circuit is a good
choice. I would use g729.
Marty
PS I can't be the stun server if asterisk is working, but quality is
poor.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
