we are sangoma shop, very good quality and support. Best Regards
Matt __________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anton Krall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:35 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron? > Well certainly sangoma cards are worth looking into now that they also offer > analog port cards, anybody knows if there is a reseller in Mexico? > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > |Rich Adamson > |Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 8:09 AM > |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron? > | > |I'd have to guess that combination of cards with almost any > |mobo would be considered an overloaded system. If you replaced > |the two TDM04b cards with an A200D or TDM2400 card, most of > |those irqmisses (etc) would probably go away; but that's a > |somewhat educated guess on my part. > | > |Factually, the sangoma cards integrate with the pci bus in a > |much more stable/usable way then does the digium TDM card (and > |I believe the te110 if it uses the TigerJet pci chip). > | > | > |Anton Krall wrote: > |> My main concerns would be, can you have multiple cards like > |this on a > |> system, for example, I now have a te110p and 2 tdm04b and Im getting > |> irqmisses on the te110p (according to zttool and zttest) which makes > |> fax receiving on the te110p almost impossible.. Plus, voice > |is getting > |> frame slips. > |> > |> I was hoping sangoma cards could be more "enterprise" friendly. > |> > |> |-----Original Message----- > |> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > |> |Novack > |> |Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 4:57 PM > |> |To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > |> |Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Performance: Xeon or Opteron? > |> | > |> |Have a 2FXO 2FXS card working now. > |> |More forgiving of the PCI bus. The software installation is > |a little > |> |mean, with the outlined procedure making assumptions about the > |> |installers knowledge and familiarity with Sangoma products, and in > |> |some places it doesn't really discriminate between their T1 > |and A200 > |> |cards. > |> |I found one defect in their FXS driver, which they have now fixed. > |> | > |> |Overall seems to be a good product, slightly more > |affordable and less > |> |of a problem child than the Digium/TigerJet TDM400 > |> | > |> |John Novack > |> | > |> |Anton Krall wrote: > |> | > |> |>Has anybody used the sangoma fxo cards with asterisk? > |Anybody using > |> |>multiple cards? Problems with irq and such (same as with > |digium ones)? > |> |> > |> |> > |> |> > |> |>|-----Original Message----- > |> |>| > |> |>|Rich Adamson wrote: > |> |>| > |> |>|> > |> |>|> While talking with one of the sangoma folks very > |recently, he was > |> |>|> rather emphatic the pci bus was designed to "share" > |> |>|interrupts. I was > |> |>|> a little concerned as a test server had the wanpipe driver > |> |>|sharing an > |> |>|> interrupt with libata and uhc1_hcd. His comment was > |> |"that's the way > |> |>|> its suppose to work, sharing interrupts as needed". I've > |> |not had any > |> |>|> recognizable issues with the A200D card at all, and faxing > |> |>|via a A200D > |> |>|> fxs port to a A200D fxo (pstn) port functions 100% reliably. > |> |>|> > |> |>|> What that would suggest is the TDM400 pci firmware > |> |(whether on card > |> |>|> logic or whatever) is the source of at least part of the > |> |>|TDM400 shared > |> |>|> interrupt issue. I don't have any digium T1/E1 cards > |> |laying around, > |> |>|> but if memory serves correctly, the T1/E1 cards do not use > |> |the same > |> |>|> pci controller chip. That would suggest the T1/E1 cards are > |> |>|less of an > |> |>|> issue then with the TDM400 card. > |> |>| > |> |>|That's good to know, but considering the response from Digium on > |> |>|the TDM400 ( try another motherboard) when there didn't seem to > |> |even be an > |> |>|int. sharing issue, the card just couldn't be seen at all > |, and the > |> |>|support I received from Sangoma on a recent FXS issue that was > |> |>|resolved within a few days, I would tend to go with Sangoma > |> |for the T1 > |> |>|card, if and when I have the need. > |> |>| > |> |>|John Novack > | > |_______________________________________________ > |--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > | > |Asterisk-Users mailing list > |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > | > | > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
