I finally got this to work without crashing * but the resulting tiff file is 8bytes
http://www.bkw.org/~brian/rxfax.txt No fax... maybe that can help. bkw On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 14:28, Christian Lademann wrote: > > I would like to try out RxFax as well. Where can I find it? > > Try www.oncall.org. > software at ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp > Instructions at http://www.opencall.org/instructions.html > > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:50:50 -0500 > > "Johnson, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Here's one last plea for help from the list before I give up on the totally > > > cool software FAX modem concept in complete despair (for now, at least, > > > until I have more time to dig into it).... > > > > > > I am simply not able to successfully receive a FAX no matter what device I > > > transmit from or how I bring the call into Asterisk. My lastest effort was > > > a call from a Pitney-Bowes FAX machine into an X100P on an analog extension > > > off our Nortel Option 11C PBX. It's not the Nortel PBX--we have analog > > > modems and faxmodems all over the place here, and even a Lucent Portmaster > > > on a CT1, hanging off that PBX and all work fine. Besides, I've already > > > tried several different faxmodems plugged directly into an S100U on the * > > > box running RxFax, I've tried sending calls across my T100P, I've tried > > > TDMoE on a lightly-loaded Ethernet segment, I even tried an IAX trunk just > > > for kicks. None of these configurations gave substantially different > > > results. The only thing I haven't tried is a TDM400P, because I don't own > > > one. > > > > > > Anyway, here is my configuration. Does anyone see ANYTHING that looks > > > amiss? Do I need SCSI drives? A P4 CPU? Patched kernel? Disabled sound? > > > Enabled sound? Windows Server 2003? (just checking...) Does anything jump > > > out? What's going wrong for me? > > > > > > Sorry for the long message, and thanks for any pointers anyone can provide, > > > Randy Johnson > > > > > > Linux: Linux ucrpsmb01.spang.com 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 > > > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux (stock RH 9 kernel) > > > Asterisk: Asterisk CVS-10/22/03-14:42:42 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > on a i686 running Linux > > > Spandsp: built from spandsp-20031021.tgz > > > Hardware: Dell Dimension 4100, IDE HD, PIII-933Mhz, 512MB RAM, 3Com > > > 3C905B-TX NIC > > > > > > /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf (for X100P): > > > echocancel=no > > > echocancelwhenbridged=no > > > context=demo > > > callerid=asreceived > > > signalling=fxs_ls > > > channel => 1 > > > > > > Cat /proc/interrupts: > > > CPU0 > > > 0: 319219 XT-PIC timer > > > 1: 106 XT-PIC keyboard > > > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > > > 3: 26070 XT-PIC eth0 > > > 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc > > > 9: 565549 XT-PIC es1371 > > > 10: 0 XT-PIC usb-uhci > > > 11: 2664131 XT-PIC wcfxo > > > 12: 399 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse > > > 14: 9956 XT-PIC ide0 > > > 15: 86218 XT-PIC ide1 > > > NMI: 0 > > > ERR: 0 > > > > > > Output on * console when receiving FAX: > > > > > > -- Executing Answer("Zap/1-1", "") in new stack > > > -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/tmp/testfax.tiff") in new stack > > > Changed from phase 0 to 1 > > > Start receiving document > > > Changed from phase 1 to 4 > > > Sending ident > > > >>> CSI: 40 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 > > > DIS: > > > Store and forward Internet fax: no > > > Real-time Internet fax: no > > > Preferred octets: 256 > > > Can receive fax > > > Data signalling rate: V.29 > > > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > > > 2D coding OK > > > Scan line length: 215mm > > > Recording length: A4 (297mm) > > > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 > > > R8x15.4lines/mm OK > > > Inch-based resolution preferred: no > > > Metric-based resolution preferred: no > > > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 > > > >>> DIS: 80 00 c6 f0 80 80 01 > > > HDLC underflow in state 9 > > > Changed from phase 4 to 3 > > > <<< TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 33 33 33 30 20 36 39 36 20 32 31 34 > > > TSI without final frame tag > > > Remote fax gave TSI as: "412 696 0333 " > > > <<< DCS: 83 00 46 78 00 > > > DCS with final frame tag > > > In state 9 > > > DCS: > > > Store and forward Internet fax: no > > > Real-time Internet fax: no > > > Can receive fax > > > Data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps > > > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > > > Scan line length: 215mm > > > Recording length: B4 (364mm) > > > Minimum scan line time: 0ms > > > Get at V.29 > > > Changed from phase 3 to 5 > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > Changed from phase 5 to 4 > > > 0 bad bits in trainability test > > > Start rx document - compression 1 > > > Start rx page > > > >>> CFR: 84 > > > HDLC underflow in state 5 > > > Post trainability > > > Changed from phase 4 to 5 > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > Fast carrier up > > > Equalizer state: > > > -7 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > -6 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > -5 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > -4 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > -3 ( -0.61756, -0.03965) -> 0.38295 > > > -2 ( 0.23038, 0.68354) -> 0.52031 > > > -1 ( -0.30216, -0.17821) -> 0.12306 > > > 0 ( -2.34509, -1.86243) -> 8.96806 > > > 1 ( -0.30216, -0.17821) -> 0.12306 > > > 2 ( 0.23038, 0.68354) -> 0.52031 > > > 3 ( -0.61756, -0.03965) -> 0.38295 > > > 4 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > 5 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > 6 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > 7 ( 0.00000, 0.00000) -> 0.00000 > > > Equalizer state: > > > -7 ( -0.26413, 0.01494) -> 0.06999 > > > -6 ( 0.21546, 0.63969) -> 0.45563 > > > -5 ( 0.18946, 0.39304) -> 0.19038 > > > -4 ( -0.30719, -0.28631) -> 0.17634 > > > -3 ( -1.06797, -0.37488) -> 1.28108 > > > -2 ( 0.33797, 1.14351) -> 1.42183 > > > -1 ( 0.20738, 0.77454) -> 0.64292 > > > 0 ( -1.96690, -1.42811) -> 5.90821 > > > 1 ( -0.33907, -0.76008) -> 0.69269 > > > 2 ( 0.20528, -0.06647) -> 0.04656 > > > 3 ( -0.45137, -0.01184) -> 0.20388 > > > 4 ( 0.24556, 0.41087) -> 0.22911 > > > 5 ( 0.00681, -0.19050) -> 0.03634 > > > 6 ( -0.07823, -0.72290) -> 0.52871 > > > 7 ( 0.05250, -0.20101) -> 0.04316 > > > <...more of this...> > > > Fast carrier training failed > > > Equalizer state: > > > -7 ( -0.04391, -0.15671) -> 0.02649 > > > -6 ( 0.02656, 0.18895) -> 0.03641 > > > -5 ( -0.04580, 0.17080) -> 0.03127 > > > -4 ( -0.02037, -0.30735) -> 0.09488 > > > -3 ( 0.05777, -0.24864) -> 0.06516 > > > -2 ( 0.09588, 0.97571) -> 0.96119 > > > -1 ( -0.65363, -0.09264) -> 0.43581 > > > 0 ( -1.12343, -2.36205) -> 6.84135 > > > 1 ( -0.94664, -0.85239) -> 1.62270 > > > 2 ( -0.01332, 0.46148) -> 0.21314 > > > 3 ( 0.04255, -0.31674) -> 0.10214 > > > 4 ( -0.04883, -0.07892) -> 0.00861 > > > 5 ( -0.12097, 0.02353) -> 0.01519 > > > 6 ( 0.07535, 0.07333) -> 0.01106 > > > 7 ( 0.05340, -0.04189) -> 0.00461 > > > Fast carrier down > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > Fast carrier up > > > Fast carrier down > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- > Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users