Would making FOO a global variable help in this situation?
Peter Beckman wrote:
Here's what I'm doing:
1. I set __FOO=0 in the current context.
2. I use Dial() and the M(testvar) macro call.
3. The macro-testvar can see ${FOO} just fine.
4. the macro-testvar modifies FOO. I tried:
Set(__FOO=1)
Set(_FOO=1)
Set(FOO=1)
5. When the Dial()ed call hangs up, and the original context continues,
FOO is still 0. I want it to contain 1, or whaver the child
macro-testvar sets it to.
Question:
1. Can I modify variables set in the parent context in the child
context and read them again in the parent context?
2. Is there a better way to hand back "status" of a Macro executed by
the Dial() command?
Beckman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman Internet Guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.purplecow.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Mojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Office Manger, Horan & Company, LLC
(907) 747-6666 x112
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
