Mitel ICP 3300 & Asterisk, Is possible that integration? (César)
-----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 25 de Mayo de 2006 03:00 p.m. Para: [email protected] Asunto: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 147 Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: FreePBX virtualization (Shane Burrell) 2. Re: OT: AudioCodesMP124-C/FSX/AC/SIP (Erick Perez) 3. FW: [isp-clec] Treasury disconnects tax on long-distance calls - with refunds (Brian C. Fertig) 4. Re: Asterisk codec negotiation patch (Patrick) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:34:00 -0400 From: "Shane Burrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreePBX virtualization To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" We have a revision of this that we use in house. We are interested in working with others on a version 2 skipping some of the mistakes of our first version and using a better model. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Salama Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 2:23 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreePBX virtualization Any alternate open-source solutions? On May 25, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Douglas Garstang wrote: > Yes, but it fast becomes a provisioning and management nightmare. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kerry Garrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:07 PM >> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' >> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreePBX virtualization >> >> >> You can by creating different contexts and using the >> Administrators function >> allow them to modify some of the settings themselves. >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >>> Daniel Salama >>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:42 AM >>> To: Non-Commercial Discussion Asterisk >>> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreePBX virtualization >>> >>> Does FreePBX support virtualization of its services? For >>> example, can I use it to provide virtual PBX to different >>> clients under the same instance of FreePBX? Or is it more >>> geared to single office-type installation? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- >>> >>> Asterisk-Users mailing list >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- >> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:37:18 -0500 From: "Erick Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: AudioCodesMP124-C/FSX/AC/SIP To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Billy, i you manage to connect them, please let me know...im also in a battle with it and audiocodes support line seems very unhelpful. On 5/25/06, William Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your help, however I still cannot get this thing to connect to > asterisk. I followed your instructions to the letter & couldn't get it to > connect. > > I'd be happy to throw it up on a public IP if anyone would like to take a > crack at getting it to work. > > Thanks, > > bp > > On 5/24/06, The VoIP Connection <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here are the step by step instructions for setting up a brand new > Audiocodes > > FXS gateway for use with an Asterisk server: > > > > Connect the gateway to a network switch and connect a computer to the same > > switch. Then configure the IP address of the computer to 10.1.10.2. Then > run > > your web browser and point it to http://10.1.10.10 and login using the > > information below. > > > > Default IP address: 10.1.10.10 > > Default user name: Admin > > Default password: Admin > > > > Goto "Quick Setup" and change the following: > > IP Address => Set to the new IP address of the AudioCodes gateway > > Subnet Mask => Set to the correct netmask for your local network > > Default Gateway Address => Set to the correct gateway IP address for your > > local network > > Working With Proxy => Set to "Yes" > > Proxy IP Address => Set to the IP address of the Asterisk server > > Enable Registration => Set to "Enable" > > > > Restart the gateway then log back in using the new IP address. > > > > Goto Protocol Management -> Protocol Definition -> Proxy & Registration > > Registrar IP Address => Set to the IP address of the Asterisk server > > Registration Time => Set to "60" > > Subscription Mode => Set to "Per Endpoint" > > Authentication Mode => Set to "Per Endpoint" > > > > Goto Protocol Management -> Protocol Definition -> DTMF & Dialing > > Max Digits In Phone Num => Set to a large enough number such as "32" > > > > Goto Protocol Management -> Protocol Definition -> Coders > > Add coders as needed You need to set at least G.711U-law > > > > Goto Protocol Management -> Endpoint Settings -> Authentication > > Set SIP username and password for each port > > > > Goto Protocol Management -> Endpoint Phone Numbers > > Enter an extension (phone) number for every used channel > > > > Your AudioCodes gateway is now ready. > > > > Michael Crown > > Managing Partner > > www.thevoipconnection.com > > 321.989.6728 ext. 611 > > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -- ------------------------------------------- Erick Perez Linux User 376588 http://counter.li.org/ (Get counted!!!) Panama, Republic of Panama ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:37:29 -0400 From: "Brian C. Fertig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FW: [isp-clec] Treasury disconnects tax on long-distance calls - with refunds To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Cc: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" FYI Brian Fertig Treasury disconnects tax on long-distance calls WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The brief Spanish-American War ended more than a century ago, but not the federal tax assessed to fund the victory. Until now. On Thursday, the U.S. Treasury said it would stop collecting the 3% federal excise tax on long-distance calls, a fee originally assessed in 1898. The government also said it will issue refunds requested by consumers and businesses that paid the fee over the past three years. Taxpayers will be able to request refunds when they file 2006 tax returns in early 2007. The Treasury also said the Justice Department would cease litigation in support of the tax after a handful of federal appeals courts ruled the fee illegal in decisions rendered within the past year. The most recent loss in federal court occurred earlier this month. "The Federal Appeals courts have spoken across the board," Treasury Secretary John Snow said in a statement. "It's time to 'disconnect' this tax and put it on the permanent 'do not call' list." The tax, which generates more than $6 billion annually, has survived repeated efforts to eliminate it, most recently in 2000, when President Bill Clinton vetoed a larger bill that included a repeal of the excise fee. Bills aimed at ending the tax have circulated every year since. For decades, long-distance companies such as AT&T Inc. have been required to collect the excise fee from customers and pass it on to the federal government. Yet some large corporations such as Hewlett Packard successfully sued to get rid of the tax, claiming it was illegal. Others have won large refunds from the IRS. The excise tax works out to $1.50 per every $50 in long-distance calls, not a particularly large sum for consumers. Yet for a business that spends, say, $10,000 a month on long-distance calls, the tax would equal $300 a month or $3,600 a year. If the tax remained in place over the next decade, it would have generated about $67 billion for the federal coffers, a congressional panel estimates. Altogether, the excise has raised more than $300 billion in its entire existence, the Congressional Research Service found. The excise fee was originally established in 1898 on long distance because phones were considered a luxury and only the wealthiest Americans could afford service. These days, the tax affects all consumers directly or indirectly, no matter what their annual income. In announcing his decision, Treasury Secretary Snow also called on Congress to eliminate federal taxes on local phone calls. That tax is separate from the long-distance fee. This email was scanned by: Mcafee GroupShield ---------------- CONFIDENTIAL DISCLAMER ---------------- All information provided in this email is considered confidential and proprietary of Planet Telecom, Inc. and Telecenter Inc. Use of this information by anyone other than the recipient or sender will be considered in breach of agreement. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 20:56:31 +0200 From: Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk codec negotiation patch To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:53 -0500, Erick Perez wrote: > does anybody knows if this patch made it into Asterisk Business Edition? > http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825 > > The latest release is : > asterisk127_codec_negotiation-20060505.diff.gz > > We are unsure as to buy ABE or go and download the open source > version, in terms of patch availability and features. > > Comments are welcomed, Afaik the ABE is based on 1.0.x and this patch refers to Asterisk 1.2.7 so even if unmerged patches were included in the ABE (they are not according to Kevin) than this patch would have had to be backported to 1.0.x first. Regards, Patrick ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users End of Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 22, Issue 147 *********************************************** _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
