http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-October/060872.html
Also, TerraSoft sponsored an Asterisk port to YellowDog Linux on PPC - from what I gather, with full Zaptel support.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Linux+Yellow+Dog
I didn't think it's be necessary to run YDL to get Zaptel to work. Does anyone know if this is the case? From what I understand, as long as zaptel compiles it's up to udev and the kernel to do the remaining hardware detection and resource assignment, which should be a distribution-agnostic process.
Is it possible that this particular chip used in this particular X100P clone is not supported on LinuxPPC? It is a Motorola 6508 chip, identical to the SM56 winmodem. A picture of the card is here:
http://cgi.ebay.ca/Its-Real-X100P-FXO-card-oem-for-Digium-Asterisk-pbx_W0QQitemZ9730539695QQcategoryZ61841QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting
Appreciative for any help.
On 5/25/06, Lachek Butalek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I took a chance with an X100P knock-off on eBay. I'm running Asterisk + FreePBX on a PowerMac G3 (beige desktop) using Slackintosh 10.2 and kernel 2.6.16.16. Everything has been fine up until now.
I compile the 1.2.5 Zaptel drivers without a problem, get the udev configuration in, modprobe zaptel, and finally modprobe wcfxo. At this point, I get the message:
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)
FATAL: Error running install command for wcfxo
dmesg gives me:
Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
Zaptel Version: 1.2.5 Echo Canceller: MG2
Failed to initailize DAA, giving up...
wcfxo: probe of 0000:00:0e.0 failed with error -5
syslog tells me:
May 25 21:28:20 asterisk kernel: Failed to initailize DAA, giving up...
May 25 21:28:20 asterisk kernel: wcfxo: probe of 0000:00:0e.0 failed with error -5
ztcfg -vv says:
Channel 01: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
1 channels configured.
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)
and lspci -vv tells me this:
00: 0e.0 Communication controller: Motorola: Unknown device 5608
Subsystem: Motorola: Unknown device 0000
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 32 (250ns min, 32000ns max)
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 24
Region 0: I/O ports at fe000800 [size=256]
Region 1: Memory at 81803000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
One of the reasons I'm running on a PowerMac is specifically because I've been told the X100P cards work well on this type of hardware, since it tends to not have problems with flawed PCI buses and IRQ sharing, but I'm starting to have my doubts. If anyone has experience with X100P cards on PPC, or have any other insights, it would be greatly appreciated.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
