Matt Roth wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:

Please let us know your results. I cannot really test this in production system since it is a $16,000/hr call center. I was using madplay but it was crashing and creating zombie processes, I figured native was not the way to go since all of the different audio streams. Mpg123 works perfectly for me under a load of sixty channels, I can confirm that for sure.

Thanks,
Steve

Steve,

mpg123 has the same problem with zombie processes as you were experiencing with MadPlay. For a scalable system, native MOH is the way to go. As per Kevin Fleming, it only introduces a slight memory overhead. mpg123 consumes CPU cycles to decompress the mp3s and in my experience, a large scale Asterisk system is much hungrier for CPU cycles than memory.

The different audio streams used by native MOH are not really a problem for the following reasons:

1) The native MOH files are likely to be cached, so they are probably being read from memory.
2) The native MOH files do not require decompression or transcoding.
3) The MOH is handled in the same thread as the call itself, so there is very little CPU overhead.

As always, I believe that the information I'm sharing is accurate but welcome any corrections or additions.

Thank you,

Matthew Roth
InterMedia Marketing Solutions
Software Engineer and Systems Developer
_______________________________________________

Thanks for your clarification, I will try native but most likely wind up streaming MOH from another box.

Thanks,
Steve

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to