On the spa3000 the firmware version seems to greatly effect the echo. Mine came with 2.x firmware which was fine, I upgraded to (latest) 3.1.10d and it was horrible. I then downgraded to 3.1.3a and it was OK, but not as good a 2.x version. The reason I upgraded in the first place was to allow FXO calls to be passed but not answered, which was not a 2.x feature.
It seems that any firmware is usable on any hardware as my hardware is 2.x. I wonder if 3102 firmware could be used on the 3000. Is the size the same? I guess you would have to be willing to make a brick to find out! Doug On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Rich Adamson wrote: > Nabeel Jafferali wrote: > >> Anyone know what the differences are between the spa3000 and > >> spa3102 other then packaging? > > > > The SPA3102 has a built-in router (LAN + WAN), T.38 on the FXS port and can > > handle dual G.729 sessions. > > Has there been any improvements in the echo cancellation functions > associated with the fxo port? > > R. > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin (1759) **************************** * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307 * * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * http://www.crompton.com * **************************** _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
