> -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:51 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle > ComplexFailoverSituations > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:41 AM > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi Not Able to Handle > > ComplexFailoverSituations > > > > > > On 15/06/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Who said I was a C programmer? > > > > Speaking for myself, I just assumed that you understood that the > > behaviour of an open-source application was the result of > contributed > > code. Your message read to me like something of a demand that > > "someone" fixed it. You are probably trying to do something pretty
I get annoyed Stephen when Digium goes around calling Asterisk 'enterprise grade', which in my opinion it really isn't. I'd consider distributed ACD queues to be a requirement for an enterprise grade product, but it's becoming apparent that there is no mechanism for implementing this. I'm being told that DUNDi isn't the right man for the job. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
