I have some experience with fibre-channel. I wouldn't be surprised if Asterisk
behaved in exactly the same way if a fibre-channel volume went offline. It's
also prohibitively expensive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Avi Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 6/17/2006 1:06 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail with NFS
Douglas Garstang wrote:
> I don't think unison is a workable solution. It doesn't scale. The
network and system load would increase exponentially as we added asterisk
servers to our cluster.
If you're clustering that many boxes, I'd investigate fibre channel SAN
and GFS. That way, each node of the cluster just mounts the voicemail
location locally.
--
National Manager - Special Projects
< Melbourne / Sydney / Canberra / Hobart / London />
2/340 Gore Street T: 1 300 SQUIZ (77859)
Fitzroy, VIC T: 03 9486 0411
3065 F: 03 9486 0611
W: http://www.squiz.net/
.....>> Open Source - Own it - Squiz.net ...../>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
