> I was willing to give vb a chance at one time, but won't touch it any > more.
I am not defending VB. I won't touch it either (I use XWT for all my cross-platform user interface type stuff, any web monkey can be proficient in it in a very short time) -- I am defending Dan's work in actually producing an app, no matter how simple, that can be used as a starting point. The man put some effort into something and actually _has_ product and you get snide remarks about what he did it in... Wankers. > you have to end up asking yourself, is it still vb after I replace all > the parts with c to get it to do what I want ? if the answer is more than > 50%, why start with vb in the first place ? Agreed. But Dan created what I would consider a "proof of concept" application -- why'd he get blasted on that? I don't see anyone else stepping up and showing anything THEY'VE put forth. Like I said, I won't touch VB either, but Dan's actually gone and done something instead of pissing and moaning about the language that was used. If you're interested: www.xwt.org -- It's not my baby but I love the technology. Andrew _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
