Which public STUN servers are you using or did you setup your own? > -----Original Message----- > From: Cullin J. Wible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 8:56 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial > Discussion'; 'Iain Barker' > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > We've used a number of the polycom 301 and 501 phones in our office. > > We have also deployed a dozen of the Linksys SPA-1001 > single-line FXS adapters using G726, SIP, NAT and STUN. They > are extremely reliable and easy to deploy - $60-$70 US each. > > We tested a number of IAX hard phones and didn't find > anything that was reliable and/or suitable for our corporate > setting. We really wanted to run IAX for remote users, but > eventually decided that SIP/STUN was easier to support. > > We also tested the IAXy device and found that it's inability > to use DNS resolution, only be configured on Linux, and only > run ulaw/alaw made and that it cost more then the SPA-1001, > which can use DNS, G726/G729 and has web-based configuration > for less money the more attractive option. > > We also tested the IAX hard phone made by AT-COM only to find > that a number of features such as call transfer do not work. > > For home/remote users: setup STUN, and use a SPA-1001. For a > corporate setting I highly recommend the Polycom phones. > > Cheers, > > Cullin J. Wible > Co-Founder & CTO > Email Data Source, Inc. > 212-514-8900 x1006 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Doug Crompton > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:49 PM > To: Iain Barker > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > Iain, > > Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From > what I can see if I bought this phone and two remotes my > outlay would be close to $800 US. > This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to > do with your money! > > You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS > devices for that amount! > > Doug > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote: > > > Doug, > > > > What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base > > Ethernet/SIP screenphone supporting multiple wireless > handsets [but as > > this is a non-commercial list I won't go into more detail > here, google > > for the above model number if you're interested in more info.] > > > > - Iain > > > > --- > > Message: 4 > > Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT) > > From: Doug Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk? > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > <[email protected]> > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > > > Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not > there for a > > bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a > > wireless sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow > > multiple extension off of one base. The base would connect to the > > internet. The other problem is many of these phones require > power, so > > even if you have backup for your central system the phone > still needs > > to be on it. Power over ethernet would help. > > > > Doug > > > > > "Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little > temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben > Franklin (1759) > > **************************** > * Doug Crompton * > * Richboro, PA 18954 * > * 215-431-6307 * > * * > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * > * http://www.crompton.com * > **************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
