ooops,
sorry, you right, forgot to mention it...
It was to be compared with AMD 64.
Olivier
C F a écrit :
Olivier can you please do a cat /proc/cpuinfo and post it here? I
think you have a 64 bit cpu.
On 7/9/06, olivier.taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fyi,
Double Intel Xeon 3Ghz performance below
g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex
ilbc
g723 - - - - - - - - -
- -
gsm - - 2 2 2 2 1 4 10
29 14
ulaw - 2 - 1 2 2 1 4 10
29 14
alaw - 2 1 - 2 2 1 4 10
29 14
g726 - 2 2 2 - 2 1 4 10
29 14
adpcm - 2 2 2 2 - 1 4 10
29 14
slin - 1 1 1 1 1 - 3 9
28 13
lpc10 - 3 3 3 3 3 2 - 11
30 15
g729 - 3 3 3 3 3 2 5 -
30 15
speex - 3 3 3 3 3 2 5 11
- 15
ilbc - 3 3 3 3 3 2 5 11
30 -
Olivier
Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:07:16AM -0400, C F wrote:
Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
In the ideal case you'll get double performance with two CPUs. In
theory.
A case of many concurrent calls is basically something that can be
easily parallelized. So in theory nothing stops you from getting
something closer to double performance. I don't know how close reality
is to that nice theory.
I only remarked that 'show translations' totally ignores the second CPU.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
