Martin Joseph wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Rich Adamson wrote: > >> Andrea Spadaccini wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I need to install Asterisk on a test machine that will soon become a >>> production environment. >>> Do you think that 1.2.9.1 is reliable? I read some posts that say it >>> isn't as good as the previous versions. Should I install 1.2.8 or >>> 1.2.7.1? >> >> I've had no issues at all with 1.2.9.1, however there have been >> several patches applied to the svn which I don't believe are part of >> the distro packages as yet. (My system is very basic with no need for >> queues, etc.) >> > Same here, about three weeks of uptime on 1.2.9.1 with no issues, but > a very simple setup. YMMV. > > On 2 setups, 1 very simple, 1 with queues and a hardware timing source, the latter crashed 3 times in the first week (stable since then), and has been dropping calls. The former has been rock solid, and fine.
Looking at the bugtracker, there have been a lot of fixes since 1.2.9.1 was released, I wonder when 1.2.10 will be here (or 1.4.0b). _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
