I must agree,
we use 2 Ser in front of 4 asterisk sharing the same database cluster.
Olivier
Brian Capouch a écrit :
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Would you like me to dig up the posts from Keving Fleming stating
that this is known not to work Brian?
As I recall those posts have to do with the way your particular setup
required ARA to work with a failover/redundant cluster system you were
building.
Beyond that I'm not really interested in getting into a pissing
contest. I have ONE SQL table called "extensions_table" on ONE SQL
server, but have maybe 20 SIP phones using that same database, placing
calls from 10-12 separate Asterisk instances.
I was calling into question your presenting a "well-known fact" that
appears to be incorrect. If Kevin sees this and wants to chime in to
support your statement and tell me that my experience is somehow an
illusion, he's certainly welcome to do so. I have experienced the
taste of crow, and eat it when needed. You?
Can certain situations be construed where ARA will not do exactly what
the administrator wants? Apparently, from reading some of your posts,
true.
Can multiple Asterisk servers be set up to use a single database
instance to store common configuration information? Certainly true,
from my and many other people's experiences.
The thrust of my post was to refute the "fact," and to suggest you
perhaps adopt a little less inflammatory rhetoric when you post to
this list.
B.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
