On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 05:29:21PM -0500, Moises Silva wrote: > On 7/20/06, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:51:25PM -0500, Moises Silva wrote:
> >> >2) Why the Unicall package? Not *how* but *why*. > >> > >> You are not forced to use Unicall, but AFAIK, libmfcr2 is the only > >> MFCR2 open source library and since libmfcr2 was wrote by the same guy > >> that wrote Unicall telephony abstraction (Steve Underwood), makes > >> sense to use it. However you can use Asterisk Zapata channels with > >> MFCR2 support, that way you skip the Unicall thing, however, Zapata > >> would still be using libmfcr2, and I think there is even less > >> documentation about using Zapata with libmfcr2 than using Unicall with > >> libmfcr2. > > > >AFAIK, the "MFCR2 support" in chan_zap doesn't actually work and was > >Steve Underwood's first shot at the problem. I believe it is to be > >removed from 1.4. > > I really dont know, if it works, but digging into the source for other > purposes, I just looked a lot of code in chan_zap with ifdefs > regarding MFCR2. Some reference: http://bugs.debian.org/342139 MFCR2 support has been patched out of Debian's chan_zap for that reason. chan_unicall is availble in a separate package. -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
