This company seems to think pros outweigh the cons for Asterisk: www.voicepulse.com /. reported today that VoicePulse uses a variation of Asterisk to run their Broadband Phone Service. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/05/1319251&mode=thread&tid=126
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:36, WipeOut wrote:
Gavin Hamill wrote:
No built in high availability or clustering options making it as reliable as the harware, OS and apps..It would seem an odd question, but I'm trying to put together a little presentation on 'Why Asterisk?' and need to list Pros and Cons.... I've got plenty of Pros (including the availability of commercial support), but the only Con I can think of is 'Relatively few installations worldwide'
Can anyone think of any others?
Last time I looked it up PC systems combined hardware components average reliability was about 96% uptime(This was a while back so the percentage may not be accurate).. This is a problem for telecom's system whos uptime is usually measured in years and not a percentage of 1 year..
No flames please, I realise that there are issues involved with the PSTN lines, channel banks and some other things in a clustered senario..
I think the number you cited needs qualification to be accurate. Because if it where accurate as it stands, I'm due for major downtime in my rack as I have several systems approaching 2 years uptime without a single hardware failure. These machines also where not new when they where sent to the colo facility. In fact they all had been running for about a year before hand.
And as a question of the 5 9's reported on telco hardware, As far as I know, that is for total system failure. The fact that they could loose trunks, or even a portion of a neighbor hood doesn't count against their downtime. If it did, I could point to a couple of telcos in this area that would have problems meeting those requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------- to back up my claim about uptime, my webserver is showing 136 days uptime, this is after a 497 day wrap around of the uptime counter. This machine is a Dell pe2450
the mail server is a home built 700 celeron showing the same 136 day uptime after the 497 day uptime wrap around.
Due to a hacker, our clients machine is showing 105 days uptime post 497 day uptime wrap around. Again home built machine.
One of our fileservers is showing 133 days uptime post uptime wrap around. This is due to a screw up at the keyboard just 3 days after installing it in the colo. Also a home built machine.
Our VPN machine is just getting up to 354 days uptime. This is a super micro we purchased and put into service shortly there after.
Our database server just went through a hardware and software upgrade that caused it's reboot, now at 185 days uptime. Same hardware as the above listed webserver.
The 2 machines in my rack without impressive uptimes are a NT machine and my phone gateway that just had a kernel update.
This should probe that good power supply to the machine will help make hardware run well for a long time. Why do you think the telco equipment runs on 48volts? They are pulling from the batteries 100% of the time. This makes a smooth even power flow.
Machines in my office are subjected to poorer quality power and tweaking so they don't tend to make it to the 200 day uptime mark very often.
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
