When I looked several months ago, the only Sipura that supported T.38 was the SPA-2100. I haven't searched in a while, but I think it is still true. We go directly from a Cisco gateway to the SPA-2100 and it works great. It is the only ATA that we've seen that works right.

Joshua Colp wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Olivier
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:18:29 -0300
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Which ATA to test
T.38 ? What about Linksys 3102


Hi,

Which ATA supporting T.38 would you recommend (for reliability) ?
Has anyone experienced this one ?

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Linksys-Cisco+3102

Regards



Hello There,

I know that during our testing for T.38 capability in trunk Matt (the person 
who was doing the testing) went through the Grandstream ATAs initially and 
could not get them to work. Thanks to a generous donation he then moved onto 
trying with Sipura ATAs instead and they worked great so I would assume that 
the 3102 would also work nicely. Sipura (should I call them Linksys now?) have 
done a good job on their SIP stack and appear to have done a good job on their 
T.38 implementation too. If you do end up giving them a try, definitely report 
back so others will have some feedback.

Have a great day!

Joshua Colp
Digium
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--

Network stuff you didn't know....
http://www.networkoblivion.com

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to