Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Douglas Garstang)
2. RE: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Douglas Garstang)
3. Re: Re: Zaptel install - Fedora Core 5 (Rich Adamson)
4. RE: Compilation (Dan Austin)
5. RE: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Douglas Garstang)
6. Re: Unable to match on CallerID in an include block
(Julian Lyndon-Smith)
7. Re: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (simon elliston ball)
8. Re: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Don)
9. RE: SLA.conf (shadowym)
10. RE: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Aaron Daniel)
11. RE: Unable to match on CallerID in an include block
(Steve Hanselman)
12. Re: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Jason Parker)
13. Re: Linksys SPA-941 Message Waiting Indicator (Cliff Brake)
14. RE: Apache for FastAGI (Tielin Xu)
15. Asterisk and spandsp (Jan Fousek)
16. Asterisk and spandsp (Jan Fousek)
17. Re: Unable to match on CallerID in an include block
(Julian Lyndon-Smith)
18. RE: Realtime Extensions -- Comments? (Douglas Garstang)
19. LOUD MP3 Hold Music (Dennis P. Clark)
20. Re: LOUD MP3 Hold Music (David Freeman)
21. Re: LOUD MP3 Hold Music (Rich Adamson)
22. How can I implement Music on Call Transfer? (Crazy Boy)
23. CTI (Fernando BERRETTA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:13:25 -0600
From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to
temporarily deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a
comment flag, I'd have to completely remove those entries
from the extensions table! That's not very friendly is it...
Is there a better way?
Yes, DON'T USE REALTIME!
I wish it was that easy. We started looking at realtime again, because the option of building the config files with a script querying the database became daunting.
It doesn't matter where you turn in Asterisk, there's gotcha's. For example, you can't put the hint stuff into realtime, and there's no inherint way to comment extensions.
Doug.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:14:17 -0600
From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
----- Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The unofficial docs on the voip wiki for the realtime
extensions table
structure is:
CREATE TABLE `extensions_table` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`context` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`exten` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`priority` tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
`app` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`appdata` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY (`context`,`exten`,`priority`),
KEY `id` (`id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to temporarily
deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a comment flag,
I'd have to
completely remove those entries from the extensions table!
That's not
very friendly is it... Is there a better way?
Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I cheated, and just added a comments field to the table.
Asterisk only reads fields by name, so extra columns don't
hurt at all.
How did an extra field that Asterisk doesn't know anything about, change it's
behaviour?
Doug.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:16:38 -0500
From: Rich Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Zaptel install - Fedora Core 5
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:42:36AM -0500, Rich Adamson wrote:
Tomislav Par�ina wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
I did "yum update" last week and here is my current kernel:
I had no problem at all with zaptel. I am only using TDM400P though, in
case that matters.
Hi Anto!
The thing is that I can't rely on yum update for asterisk installation. I
would like something that will work like this: I install FC5 from CD/DVD,
install RPM's that I need from my ftp server or from CD, install zaptel,
libpri, asterisk...
So, I need to download rpm's that will allow me to install
zaptel/libpri/asterisk without using yum update (I need to make all
installations the same).
Why bother with the rpm's?
Because you have some other programs on your system other than Asterisk.
And because you want a reproducable build.
Guess that depends a lot on personal objectives, styles, and whether
asterisk code has been modified locally. Once the reproducable build is
operational and one has to maintain the code, reproducable builds sort
of go out the window (eg, customer/system A has a problem, but not
customer B through Z).
Using the Branch SVN checkout approach always provides the most up to
date code as opposed to replicating buggy stuff via rpms.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:19:14 -0700
From: "Dan Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Compilation
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Which version of Web-MeetMe did you download? The process up to 2.0.1
is, well, annoying.
Copy app_cbmysql.c to ./asterisk/apps and modify the Makefile to include
the application.
The project is now hosted on SourceForge and has a much improved build
process, but I have
not built a release tarball yet.
Dan
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Khaled
Chehab
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 4:01 AM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [asterisk-users] Compilation
Dear
I am installing Web-MeetMe ,one of the requirements is
app_cbmysql.c
I have it but ,how can I compile it .
Regards
________________________________
*********************************************
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding
agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without
express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views
expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily
reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates.
This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed
to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from
disclosure belonging to Xplorium.
If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message
and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and
notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or
attachment or disclose its content to any other person.
Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic
message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer
viruses or other defects.
*********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060822/245f726d/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:19:55 -0600
From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
Add a boolean field to the table then create a view based on the
value of that field
CREATE TABLE `extensions_table_data` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
'isActive' boolean NOT NULL default 'True',
`context` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`exten` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`priority` tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
`app` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`appdata` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY (`context`,`exten`,`priority`),
KEY `id` (`id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to temporarily
deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a comment flag,
I'd have
to completely remove those entries from the extensions table!
That's not very friendly is it... Is there a better way?
Then
Create view extensions_table as SELECT
id,context,exten,priority,app,appdata from extensions_table_data
where IsActive = True;
Then you can just flip the IsActive bit on/off to remove extensions
That's the workaround I've implemented.
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:29:58 +0100
From: Julian Lyndon-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to match on CallerID in an
include block
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
What version of asterisk ?
Julian
Steve Hanselman wrote:
Is there any reason why I can’t use the xxx/callerid format in an
include section?
It doesn’t seem to work, but if I paste the lines into the main section
where I include the block it does?
E.g. this doesn’t work
[telewest]
Include => spamblock
[spamblock]
_X./12345,s,macro(spamcall)
Whereas this does:
[telewest]
_X./12345,s,macro(spamcall)
Any ideas?
Steve
The information contained in this email is intended for the personal and
confidential use
of the addressee only. It may also be privileged information. If you are
not the intended
recipient then you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and
that any review, distribution or copying of this document is strictly
prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify Brendata immediately
on:
+44 (0)1268 466100, or email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Brendata (UK) Ltd
Nevendon Hall, Nevendon Road, Basildon, Essex. SS13 1BX UK
Registered Office as above. Registered in England No. 2764339
See our current vacancies at www.brendataco.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:34:26 +0100
From: simon elliston ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
note http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+RealTime+Extensions
comment from Philipp Dunkel.
On 22 Aug 2006, at 17:13, Douglas Garstang wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
Douglas Garstang wrote:
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to
temporarily deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a
comment flag, I'd have to completely remove those entries
from the extensions table! That's not very friendly is it...
Is there a better way?
Yes, DON'T USE REALTIME!
I wish it was that easy. We started looking at realtime again,
because the option of building the config files with a script
querying the database became daunting.
It doesn't matter where you turn in Asterisk, there's gotcha's. For
example, you can't put the hint stuff into realtime, and there's no
inherint way to comment extensions.
Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:38:11 -0400
From: "Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
He meant he added another column in the database table...
In the asterisk source everything database related for the default database
stuff is explicitly named...
Like INSERT INTO blah(col1,col2,col3) Values(foo,foo,foo)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Garstang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
----- Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The unofficial docs on the voip wiki for the realtime
extensions table
structure is:
CREATE TABLE `extensions_table` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`context` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`exten` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`priority` tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
`app` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`appdata` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY (`context`,`exten`,`priority`),
KEY `id` (`id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to temporarily
deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a comment flag,
I'd have to
completely remove those entries from the extensions table!
That's not
very friendly is it... Is there a better way?
Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I cheated, and just added a comments field to the table.
Asterisk only reads fields by name, so extra columns don't
hurt at all.
How did an extra field that Asterisk doesn't know anything about, change
it's behaviour?
Doug.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.5/425 - Release Date: 8/22/2006
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:46:32 -0700
From: "shadowym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SLA.conf
To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks Kevin,
This is very exciting news. Let me know what if anything I can do to help
test this. I have a Grandstream GXP2000 and Aastra 9133i phone. What
sort's of phones and or features are required to support this? The Aastra
supports Broadworks SLA and standard SIP BLF but not alternate device state
BLF (yet!) such as metermaid call parking.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin P. Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA.conf
----- shadowym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found this indication that Shared Line Appearance is possibly in
SVN. Is it or is this just an indication that it is up and coming?
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7701
There is an initial implementation of SLA in SVN trunk right now, but it is
buggy and needs some redesign. We hope to get that work done before Asterisk
1.4 is released.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Senior Software Engineer
Digium, Inc.
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:46:46 -0500
From: Aaron Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:14 -0600, Douglas Garstang wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:57 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Realtime Extensions -- Comments?
----- Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The unofficial docs on the voip wiki for the realtime
extensions table
structure is:
CREATE TABLE `extensions_table` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`context` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`exten` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`priority` tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
`app` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '',
`appdata` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
PRIMARY KEY (`context`,`exten`,`priority`),
KEY `id` (`id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
Uhm... what abouts comments? What if I wanted to temporarily
deactivate a couple of extensions? Without a comment flag,
I'd have to
completely remove those entries from the extensions table!
That's not
very friendly is it... Is there a better way?
Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
I cheated, and just added a comments field to the table.
Asterisk only reads fields by name, so extra columns don't
hurt at all.
How did an extra field that Asterisk doesn't know anything about, change it's
behaviour?
Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
I think he meant a comments field, to describe the extension. Asterisk
doesn't care about extra fields in the db, but it won't use them to it's
benefit unless it's programmed in.
