On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Daniel Matos wrote: > >remote CAPI already exists for a specific protocol (Bintec). This > protocol is used by rcapidas well , a daemon which exports local CAPI > ISDN hardware via TCP using the >bintec protocol. Using rcapid you can > use the ISDN hardware remotely within windows with the 'brickware' or > from another linux host with the melware modified libcapi20 > >(ftp://ftp.melware.de). > > > >So you do can have an Asterisk server with chan-capi and the modified > libcapi20 connected via TCP to the CAPI server running rcapid. > >If you want to use that Cisco router as CAPI server instead, then you > just might need to extend the libcapi20 to support that protocol as > well. > >Armin > > Does anybody know if the Cisco implementation is different from Bintec?
I cannot tell for sure, but I doubt that since the Bintec protocol is proprietary. > Historically which one came first? I would be very happy to know that > Cisco used the (apparently) open protocol from Bintec to enhance > features, while keeping compatibility... The bintec protocol is not open (as far as I know). For rcapid it was re-engineered. Armin _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
