The svn branch-1.2 is very stable, probably more stable then the rpms
and other distro's out there, as fixes are applied when problems are
identified and corrected. Sometime later, the svn branch-1.2 is used to
create packages.
Kevin Smith wrote:
Well personally I am just glad I wasn't the only one seeing the problem.
As much as I don't like the place 100% of the blame on something unless
I fully know what is going on, in this case Asterisk, but I couldn't
see any solution but a bug.
Personally I wouldn't mind testing out the branch, but I know my boss,
isn't so trusting. How stable are the SVN branches, at least in terms of
justification for taking the system down to install it? Or is there an
easier way to test?
Thanks,
Kevin
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
----- Richard Scobie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Fullerton wrote:
I just verified it here as well. Running Asterisk 1.2.11 and two
polycom
I'll throw in a "me too" here, with the addition that it also occurs
with "canreinvite=no".
There were multiple problems in this area, introduced since Asterisk 1.2.9 was
released. We believe that with today's commits in SVN branch-1.2 they are
cured, so it would help us greatly if could download SVN branch-1.2 and try it
out on your system to see if it solves your issue.
I apologize for how this crept into the code base... it should not have
happened, and we are taking steps to ensure that future changes in the release
branch don't cause regressions like this.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
