I use canreinvite=yes in my config files, and it does work, so maybe its
a spa 941 misconfiguration.
I think if nat=no sometime it has problems if you are behind NAT, but
under same network it must not fail.
Which firmware are you running on spas?
Dan Serban escribió:
Alberto Sagredo wrote:
I have 30 SPA 941 phones with Asterisk 1.2.7.1 and 1.2.9 and it works
fine. Are you canreinvite=yes ?.
I have not been notice any problem related to transferring calls (blind
and attended)
Thank you for your response, it gave me a nudge to check the
configuration in the sip.conf file. It seems that if I set
canreinvite=no for every SIP peer, it works!
And I have found no other adverse effects. Strange issue...
Regards
Dan Serban escribió:
I have a system running Asterisk 1.2.10 (Debian packaging) and about 50
Linksys SPA-942 phones, after the initial config and mass deployment of
the phones everything looks like it's configured well.
When an incoming call is answered and then attempted to be "xfer'ed" via
the soft button on the phone itself, it seems that if you hit the button
twice in quick succession, there is no problem (effectively a blind
transfer), if then I try to tell the other extension that "Joe is
calling to sell you a fridge" and hit xfer, the calling party cannot
hear what that person at the extension is saying. Sometimes the tables
are fully turned, the caller can hear, but the operator can't hear a
thing.
One thing's for sure, if you hit the button quickly (blind transfer) it
works no problem at all.
This is what I see asterisk saying when I transfer the call
unsuccessfully.
== Spawn extension (macro-stdexten, s, 1) exited non-zero on
'SIP/82-006d42a0<ZOMBIE>' in macro 'stdexten'
== Spawn extension (macro-stdexten, s, 1) exited non-zero on
'SIP/82-006d42a0<ZOMBIE>'
I've looked at the macro with a fine tooth comb, I cannot see any
problems with it whatsoever, (though that doesn't mean that my ignorance
isn't getting in the way).
I found some mention on the digium mantis bug tracker, here's the link:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7421
Before I try and patch the source (which I'm hesitant to do since I run
the debian packages), is there another solution or maybe an unidentified
issue that I haven't been able to decipher?
If there's more information that I can provide to solve this problem,
I'd be happy to do so.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
