On 9/7/06, Matt <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Exactly... why WOULD you use two? We use 1 # for blind transfer.
If I need to enter # to an external call I enter it twice. (## will
send a single # to the called party).
On 9/6/06, Michael Strelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I don't understand the reason to use ## then. I think you are wrong.
>
>
> On 9/6/06, David Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > No, when you press the first time, Asterisk is in standby waiting for the
> other one.
> >
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
>
> >
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] De la part
> de Michael Strelnikov
> > Envoyé : 5 septembre 2006 02:37
> >
> > À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.11 and # key
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > But the behaviour should like: if pressed once the # should be
> transmitted. If pressed ## (fast) the it should be blind transfer. Isn't it?
> >
> >
> > On 9/5/06, David Gagnon < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > That why, when you dial one # then Asterisk wait to see if you dial two of
> them. You should consider changing the blindxfer function or play with the
> timer in the features.conf. In think its look like featuresdigittimeut.
> >
> >
> >
> > For the moment, if you dial #( wait 1 sec) then press it again, the second
> will work.
> >
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> > ________________________________
>
> >
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] De la part
> de Michael Strelnikov
> > Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 22:47
> > À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.11 and # key
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have "blindxfer => ##" line in my features.conf
> >
> >
> > On 9/5/06, David Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Are you sure this is not because of the dynamic features in features.conf
> ?
> >
> > By default, # is defined for the transfer feature.
> >
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
>
> >
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] De la part
> de Michael Strelnikov
> > Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:53
> > À : [email protected]
> > Objet : [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.11 and # key
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anybody have problems with recognition of the hash (#) key with *
> 1.2.11? It seams that after pressing # the call is in a progress but no data
> is sent.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
