On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:26:06PM -0500, Brian J. Schrock wrote: > > I second that, and I think I remember hearing Mark talking about it too. But..... > > What type of encryption can you do that does not introduce latency? > > That said, I would like it to support hardware encryption cards. > > I have done work with FreeS/WAN and it works, and yes it adds about 30-100ms of > latency depending on what else is going on. I think it has something to do with > keying.
I don't understand why the latency will be so high. I've run misc test (not with * since I don't have a PBX/voicemail needs with *) and find that I have less issues (more consisten responces and good throughput) with FreeS/WAN. The firewall machines maintain a persistant tunnel. They should be keeping "active" connecitons between servers humming right along. Do you have an overloaded FreeS/WAN server? I even get better results going through FreeS/WAN on one connection to my home (the cable provider seems to like to bandwith throttle the other services to some degree). _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
