On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 12:13:27PM -0500, Rich Adamson wrote:
> Does anyone know if asterisk currently supports the US government's
> Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) regulations?
> If not, does anyone have this item on their To-Do list?
Why in hell *would* anyone?
I don't think CALEA ("to", not "for" :-) applies to anything smaller
than a CO switch anyway, does it?
> court order) for law enforcement personnel, etc. The broadband / ITSP
> compliance due date is May 14, 2007.
Oh yeah; people are using Asterisk for things bigger than PBXen. Oops.
> The CALEA implementation and compliance for pstn central offices is
> complete (with some exceptions), and required software development
> efforts by each of the central office switch vendors.
Good luck with that. I suspect you *can't* implement CALEA support for
Asterisk -- doesn't the government require some security by obscurity
concerning the implementation?
Does that mean that they've made it illegal to use Asterisk?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
"That's women for you; you divorce them, and 10 years later,
they stop having sex with you." -- Jennifer Crusie; _Fast_Women_
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users