On Monday 16 October 2006 17:26, Matt wrote: > My question is... if both machiens are set to listen on 4569, will the > fact that that router is mangeling the port cause any issues?
Nope. The router should have udp/4569 forwarded to the correct server on the inside, so that when *it* gets a request on that port it sends it off to the correct server/port. From my "sip list peers" output: 2206/2206 216.xxx.yyy.96 D N 15061 Unmonitored 2201/2201 216.xxx.yyy.96 D N 5060 Unmonitored 2200/2200 216.xxx.yyy.96 D N 15060 Unmonitored As you can see, the first one that registered (2201) didn't have its source port mangled. However, 2200 and 2206, both behind the same NATing router, had their source port mangled. Asterisk works just fine like this, and IAX2 is "even better" since the audio path is multiplexed on the same port. Olle's awesome RTP patches which get symmetric RTP into Asterisk (part of Asterisk for quite some time now) make SIP and NAT almost stupidly easy. I've got installations with a dozen IP501s behind a totally-standard (and probably factory default configuration!) WRT54G router with *no* issues. -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users