Tim Panton wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006, at 19:05, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
It actually had *nothing* to do with Asterisk running on the
slug, so it seems that you might be even more confused than I am :).
He confirmed off-list that the scenario he described did not involve
running Asterisk on the slug. It involved running the softphone in a
java vm on the slug, as a softphone with audio, etc.
Well, just to fill in a datapoint, there was an issue, but not in
asterisk. I was doing something wrong in the javacode
with the way I built with the ipaddress Info Element in IAX. It turned
out that the byte swapped slug
didn't like my reply (which was wrong) in a way that failed, rather
than the i386 arch systems
which just silently ignored the my error.
My point (if I had one) was that testing against 'odd' architectures is
_very_ informative.
Tim Panton
www.mexuar.com
Tim,
Thanks for the full story!
--
Kristian Kielhofner
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
