But if we have asterisk and add on Steve's code wouldn't it (suppor to recieve a t.38 fax call and have spandsp decode it) work? What does Steve granting a license to Digium have to do with it? I don't care if Asterisk and the fax support don't come from the same place.

On 10/23/06, Lee Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:

> On 10/23/06, *Steve Underwood* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
>     The latest test versions of the spandsp support both ECM and T.38. The
>     T.38 functionality may not be available with Asterisk, though.
>
>
> Is there any other software it would work with?


Yes, OpenPBX.

> Is there any situation under which it might work?


I don't really know how to respond to the ambiguity in that question.

> If you don't mind saying, what is missing for full t.38 support?


Steve giving Digium a royalty-free license to his GPL software or a
pure-GPL branch of the Asterisk codebase, take your pick.

> Also with ECM being present now, that should eliminate distortion?


ECM remedies data corruption and not image distortion caused by a broken
viewer.

> Its at random places during the fax there are "glitches" such as parts
> of the line missing or being shifted a bit


Yes, ECM probably will address that.

Lee.

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to