On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Michiel van Baak wrote: > On 23:11, Thu 26 Oct 06, Armin Schindler wrote: > <snip></snip> > > chan-capi-cm (chan-capi.org) is a complete rewritten version of chan-capi > > with more features and as far as I can tell, much more stable. > > > > You do faxing with chan-capi 0.3.5? But this isn't faxing via CAPI, right? > > As far as I know, chan-capi 0.3.5 does not support CAPI faxing. > > You are correct. chan-capi 0.3.5 does not support faxing out > of the box. But there's a patch out there that fixes this. > It will add CapiAnswerFax(). This function saves a .sff > (structured fax file) stream to disk which you can run > through sfftobmp and stuff. We create PDF files with some > commandline tools and it's rock stable (2 years without a > missed/corrupted fax on a system that takes like 10 to 15 > faxes a week) > Because it's working and we really believe in "if it aint > broken dont fix it" we did not look into chan-capi-cm.
This feature provides chan-capi.org for a long time and since version 0.7 you can send faxes too. > <offtopic> > My personal view on things: avoid PSTN/ISDN connections > where possible and go with ITSP services. sangoma, quadbri, > capi, tdm,... they all caused headaches where IAX simply > works. Off course faxes wont work really good with ITSP but > most of them have fax2email and email2fax. > This is from a viewpoint of office PBX integration etc, not > from ITSP viewpoint > </offtopic> I don't agree here. I have a few servers running with chan-capi.org and Eicon DIVA Server cards.... no problems at all. Armin _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
