Damon Estep wrote:
Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not be a
member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?
For example;
Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23
Group 2 = channels 1 to 12
Group 3 = channels 13 to 23
The purpose is to restrict the number of channels a particular
extensions can use, but use the entire span for other extensions.
Part of a production /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf:
group=1
channel => 1-6
group=1,2
channel => 7-12
group=0
channel => 13-16
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
