> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Florell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:52 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What's up with the Manager Interface?!?! > > > On 11/29/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Asterisk Manager Interface is driving me nuts. > > Whoever wrote it should be drawn and quartered. > > You would need a ton of rope and a few hundred horses for that :) > > The Manager API code is distributed across dozens of source files in > the Asterisk code base and if you include every possible input and > output of it you are talking about code contributions from over a > hundred people(including me). > > The problem is that the Manager API is not centrally coded and has > evolved over the last 5 years to accommodate a lot of functionality > that it was never designed to do. In my experience, the Manager API is > more stable in 1.2 than it was in 1.0, and it was more stable in 1.0 > than it was in the pre 1.0 CVS codebase. > > Having developed a Manager Queue system 3 years ago, I fought a lot of > the Manage API battles and eventually got to a fairly robust and > non-blocking system that deals a lot of the flaws of the Manager API, > but it was by no means a full-featured solution that worked with every > kind of Manager input or output.
Agreed on all that, except I found AstManProxy to have just as many issues in the way it rendered XML output. Doug. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
