TP'n to follow flow..

yes i understand the out is similar/same.
i was attempting to get james to note that there already are manager commands.

as a note for parsing the manager interface..

you will probably find it easier if you parse as a block, meaning *till* a blank line.
then parse the block for all it's little tweaks <G>

Douglas Garstang wrote:
That data is no easier to parse than the output generated from:

Action: Command
Command: sip show peer <peer>

Note the colons used both as a field delimiter AND stuck in the regcontact.

CodecOrder: ulaw,g729,gsm
Status: UNKNOWN
SIP-Useragent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_601-UA/1.6.7.0098
Reg-Contact : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ChanVariable:
 parkstart,10

Doug.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Lyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 3:30 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What's up with the Manager Interface?!?!


James Texter wrote:
Doug,
Your issue isn't with the manager. It's with the CLI
output you are
trying to hijack via manager :D If you run "sip show peer
2944093" in the
CLI, you'll see a blank line, followed by a line that is "*
Name".  It
appears what you really want is a manager Action to show a
sip peer, in
which case I would recommend adding a new manager command
that returns a
string which is much more machine readable.  Remember, CLI output is
designed to be human readable.

Just my $0.02.

action: sippeers

or

action: sipshowpeer
peer: name

maybe you should do the below to refresh  your memory

action: command
command: show manager commands



_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to