It's a 11.8kbps codec that's supposed to improve the quality for non-voice signal etc. And, according to this http://www.voiceage.com/prodg729.php, it's more CPU intensive than G.729A. It's listed at 25MIPS vs 10MIPS for G.729A. Also needs more RAM compared to G.729A. I don't think it qualifies as 'play nicely on lower power hardware'.
Thanks for the link. I got the idea that it was less resource hungry after misunderstanding a pdf I'd downloaded. I took a second look and it seems they made it sound like the algorithm itself was less resource hungry when they actually meant their DSP. Sorry about that. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
