Sorry, I need to take that back. It's RHEL 3, RHEL 4 which we don't run uses Linux 2.6 but not much else is updated.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 18, 2006 1:47 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Linux distro + Asterisk or Trixbox? To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion < [email protected]> I've used Asterisk on a bunch of RH 7.3 machines which were then replaced by RHEL 4. It is very stable, my biggest compliant is that RHEL(or CentOS, which is a direct rip-off) uses outdated packages (Linux 2.4.x, Apache 1, Mysql 4, php 4, etc) and Linux 2.4.x requires certain USB hardware to use zaptel timing without a hardware card, so we have a bunch of these dual xeon machines with the wrong USB hardware and can only run MeetMe on the one with the t1 cards. So we're moving everything over to SuSE Linux, has more up-to-date packages, still very stable and generally runs asterisk very well. On 12/16/06, Phil Finkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all, I've been doing a lot of playing, and a lot of reading, and it seems people are split as to whereas if they're running their favorite Linux distro and asterisk or Trixbox. I'm getting closer to really looking at a production environment and I'm just looking for any opinions. I'm really enjoying learning linux and asterisk, so initial "ease of use" isn't really a huge benefit to me. In the end stability and upgradeability will be my main concerns. Thanks in advance, Phil _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
