I tried it on a intel 3 ghz p4 box and a athlon 3000 768 mb ram  running
vista and host for centos 4 ( vmware ) considering  the load on athlon
running asterisk ( that too under vista plus vmware ) while intel 3 ghz p4 1
GB ram box was sitting idle with centos , there was hardly a 1 ms difference
in show translation on both machines . Besides i just compared my p4's
results to ur D930 results and there is no difference ( infact my g729
results are better than ) .. But this doesnt mean both are same  dual core
cpu's will definitely give much higher number of channel transcoding then
lower p4's . Put both the box under some cpu load by other programs and then
use show translation recalc 30 and you will see performance difference
between them ;)

         g723   gsm  ulaw  alaw  g726 adpcm  slin lpc10  g729 speex  ilbc
  g723     -     -       -        -     -     -     -     -     -     -
-
   gsm     -     -       2        2      2       2     1           5
8    28    14
   ulaw     -     3      -        1      2       2     1           5
8    28    14
   alaw     -     3      1        -      2       2     1           5
8    28    14
  g726     -     3      2        2      -       2     1        5     8
28    14
adpcm     -     3      2        2      2       -     1       5     8
28    14
    slin     -     2      1        1      1       1     -       4     7
27    13
 lpc10     -     4      3        3      3       3     2         -     9
29    15
  g729     -     3      2       2      2       2     1         5     -
28    14
speex     -     4      3       3      3       3     2       6     9
-    15
    ilbc     -     4      3       3      3       3     2       6     9
29     -



On 23/12/06, Leo Ann Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
> Leo Ann Boon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm using 'show translation' to help dimension my system, but I
>> confused by the results I get. My 2 test systems (results below): an
>> AthlonXP 2000+ (1.3GHz) and a Pentium D930 (duo-core, 3.0GHz)
>> produced similar results (D930 is slightly faster). Googling shows
>> that others have similar results running on other CPU speeds >2.0GHz.
>
> Does "show translation recalc 30" show any different results?
Eric,

Before I posted, I ran tests with various recalc values between 10 and
200. The results are pretty much the same, give and take 1ms on either
side.

Forgot to add, I'm running 1.2.11 on both systems.


Leo


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to