On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 02:14:14PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:58:22AM -0700, Colin Anderson wrote: > > > > LD [M] /root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.o > > Building modules, stage 2. > > MODPOST > > *** Warning: "register_wanec_iface" > > [/root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.ko] undefined! > > *** Warning: "unregister_wanec_iface" > > [/root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.ko] undefined! > > CC /root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.mod.o > > LD [M] /root/wanpipe/patches/kdrivers/wanec/wanec.ko > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/lib/modules/2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp/build' > > make -C /lib/modules/2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp/build SUBDIRS=/root/wanpipe/kdrvtmp > > CC=gcc KBUILD_VERBOSE=0 modules > > make[1]: Entering directory `/lib/modules/2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp/build' > > CC [M] /root/wanpipe/kdrvtmp/sdla_tdmv.o > > CC [M] /root/wanpipe/kdrvtmp/sdla_remora_tdmv.o > > /root/wanpipe/kdrvtmp/sdla_remora_tdmv.c: In function `wp_remora_zap_ioctl': > > /root/wanpipe/kdrvtmp/sdla_remora_tdmv.c:227: error: `ZT_SETPOLARITY' > > undeclared (first use in this function) > > Strange. What version of Zaptel do you build against?
My guess was that this was due to building vs. zaptel 1.0 headers. When comparing zaptel.h from 1.0 and 1.2, one of the addition turns out to be: diff -u <(wget -O- http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.0/zaptel.h) \ <(wget -O- http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/tags/1.2.0/zaptel.h) \ | less /* * Set polarity -- implemented by individual driver. 0 = forward, 1 = reverse */ #define ZT_SETPOLARITY _IOW (ZT_CODE, 92, int) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
