Snom's do 729 just fine 190,320,360 all have worked well for us > > On 27 Jan 2007, at 16:33, Lee Jenkins wrote: > >> Although I wouldn't complain about a free G.729 codec, I have to be >> honest in saying that $10.00 isn't that great of an expense >> considering the better call quality you get. > > Does G.729 work by pushing up the compression, therefore moving from > work from the Network to the CPU ? Across my LAN, I'd probably be > able to handle *fewer*, rather than more calls across my * exchange > if this was the case. If it's cleverer that this, I think I'll have > to speculate a few dollars, assuming my Snoms can talk in G.729. > > cheers > -a > > -- > Regards, Andy Davidson > http://www.devonshire.it/ - 0844 704 704 7 - Sheffield, UK > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
