Matthew Rubenstein wrote:

        Are there 45 G.729 instances for the 45 ZAP legs in addition to 45
G.729 instances for the 45 SIP legs? Or do the ZAP legs not get a codec
(HW instead)?

Its a 4 Port T1 with 92 ZAP channels. So we are talking about 90 SIP Channels being fed into 90 ZAP channels (which means 180 people are talking, 90 on SIP Phones and 90 on PSTN lines). We are therefore transcoding 90 G.729 calls into 90 G.711 Calls. It eats up 90 G.729 licenses. I hope that clears things up.

Digium has also reported 80 G729 calls on their own dual cpu 2.8Ghz Xeon boxes: http://www.digium.com/en/products/voice/g729codec.php

On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 12:06 -0500, Andres wrote:
Hi Matthew,

Yes, those are really 90 SIP-ZAP calls. Which means the 4 port T1 is pretty much full of calls. All SIP endpoints are forced to G729. And as for your 125% question I really don't know why. This is just what I can see from our MRTG graphs. We graph all CPU usage and SIP/ZAP calls. All our servers are running Asterisk 1.2.9.1.

Andres.


Matthew Rubenstein wrote:

        Are those "90 calls" really 90 instances of the G.729 codec (+ other
processing), 90 "legs" (people at phones) for 45 2-party calls?

        Also, how do you get 125% more CPU bandwidth by adding another CPU,
which usually gets less than 100% more power after its overhead to
function in the system?


On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 04:46 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:57:23 -0500
From: Andres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk and multiple cpus/cores
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
      <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Erick Perez wrote:

I have found a site that list the following (no date in the post, so
it may be old):
"since all transcoding and calls still go through one core in
asterisk,
it doesn't make sense to buy a multi-core or hyperthreaded system
that
will only slow you down"

Does that still applies in asterisk 1.2.14/1.4.x ?
Or do we have to tweak source code to balance loads
(transcoding,etc)
between cores?

I can tell you that statement is bogus.  We run a number of dual cpu
and single cpu systems on our network. The dual ones (Xeon 3.6Ghz) can easily handle 90 G729 calls at 50% CPU Usage. The single ones will be at 50% with only 40 calls.

Andres

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to