Ok.. I have to admit I'm a little confused now.   I looked at some of my
machines again that work flawlessly and they have things like this (although
in BIOS it shows no sharing of IRQs)

         CPU0
 0: 1448934642    IO-APIC-edge  timer
 1:        228    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 8:          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 9:          1   IO-APIC-level  acpi
201:   83745144   IO-APIC-level  eth0
217:    7686337   IO-APIC-level  libata
233: 1446873007   IO-APIC-level  wctdm24xxp


AND

          CPU0       CPU1
 0:  362899607  362907717    IO-APIC-edge  timer
 1:          0         25    IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
 2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
 8:          0          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
14:          0          2    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
16:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  usb-uhci
18:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  usb-uhci
19:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  usb-uhci
23:          0         24   IO-APIC-level  ehci-hcd
38:    7310507   39341308   IO-APIC-level  megaraid
48: 2165109942        255   IO-APIC-level  eth0
77:  996436331 1968405724   IO-APIC-level  wcte11xp
82: 1930286687 1032956864   IO-APIC-level  wct4xxp

No problems on those systems, yet it looks like they are doing APIC IRQ
sharing (though BIOS shows otherwise).

Then I have this sytem that Digium said is doing too much sharing:
          CPU0
 0:   76478196    IO-APIC-edge  timer
 1:         79    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
 8:          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
12:         93    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
14:         23    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
121:     183199   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb2, eth0
137:          0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb3
153:          0   IO-APIC-level  ehci_hcd:usb1
161:      84182   IO-APIC-level  ips
169:   76431251   IO-APIC-level  wctdm24xxp
NMI:          0
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to