Why not make it like DNS and have each provider have their lookups
deligated to a local server and then each ISP will run a caching
server that will use a serial number system to get updates.. just like
DNS.

I know there are lot more DNS lookups then CNAM lookups per hour...
isn't there? :)

On 2/20/07, Mike Lynchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With all other things said.. you might want a professional service for this
like  targusinfo.com

Maintaining and running an operation like a cname web lookup thing is REALLY
high overhead in terms of web traffic etc

What happens when you get 30 ITSP/clients pulling 1000 calls each or 100000
calls each per day..

that can easily go up to 1 mill requests per day ,

How will you pay for the bandwith/hardware/failover/load balance etc
hardware for all this ?

or if you are going to charge then why reinvent the wheel.

targusinfo.com is what we would use..

Cname lookup is a really controversial matter , no one wants to absorb the
costs , that is why some TELCOS charge 4.95  for callerid ( its basically
the lookup service they are paying for) ..

CNAME lookups is also not mandatory for TELCOS so some do it some don't ,
but FREE cname is just not going to happen untill some one has a Return on
Investment strategy for this..


Take a look at Free 800 systems that went down , Any venture needs a capital
source of income..

my 0.02



On 2/20/07, Robert Norton - SophMedia LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hey Guys,
> I'm glad to see this ignited some discussion.
>
> I definitely understand there's some legal implications involved, both on
a privacy level, and fraud prevention. Obviously an end-user (ie: the person
controlling a listing) has to consent to some sort of release resolving the
privacy concerns. I'm somewhat aware of the legal implications involved with
storing such personally identifiable information (or whatever the legal term
is) and have a concern in making sure such issues are resolved.
>
> In reality, how is it efficient for every provider to be running their own
database? In my mind, this leaves the horribly evident inaccuracies, and
even efficiency issues. Thank God these accuracies aren't integral to the
operations of telephony systems.
>
>
>
> I do understand there is a price to pay for such infrastructure, and I
believe that it's obvious the telephony world is riddled with racketeering,
price gouging ventures, including companies that charge nearly a $0.01 for a
lookup. I realize the following analogy is poor, but in mind this is as
close as a internet search engine charging for a basic search query. Infact
a basic internet query is much more complex, much more costly (ie: the
infrastructure of said systems), and yet self-subsidizing.
>
>
> And to the poster who suggested that I was implying scrapping the results
from 411.com, this is definitely not even a remote idea in my mind at all.
The basis for my idea was a open, moderated, database that was user
controlled and self-subsidized.
>
>
>
> I know this is way off topic, but I really feel that the telecom industry
as a whole, and I'm sure I'm not the only one with this belief, is horribly
bloated, running on business models that are clearly 30 years outdated. It
is 2007, and with the help of the internet, the exchange of information,
these telcos now have real, global competition, and real issues to deal
with.
>
> Anyways guys, I'm curious to hear your thoughts.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Norton
> SophMedia LLC Operations Manager
> Cell: 480-234-4312 Office: 480-626-5449 (x300)
> P.O. Box 7755 Tempe, AZ 85281
> http://www.XStreamHost.com - Web Hosting
> http://www.SophMedia.com - Consulting & Web Development
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> NOTICE:
> This e-mail (including all attachments) may contain confidential and
privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). You, the
recipient, are obligated to maintain it in the safe, secure, and
confidential manner. Any review, use, distribution, disclosure, or copying
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete, or destroy all copies of this message immediately.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>



--
Mike
Sales Manager
http://www.voicemeup.com
Making it happen
1.877.807.VOIP (8647)
1.514.312.7030
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to