I am at the end of a long way... i try to work with a number of isdn boards (BRI not PRI) and i found only a lot of problems.
First, the bristuff that is "near" working, but not so perfect ISDN designed interface. This is not bad but in a production environment this solution is not usable. Second visdn, i am cryng because i see a lot of people sayng "yes is very attractive" but the developer and who pay him is doing a bad bad bad bad work, they work on a closed source way, very bad. And last misnd, working now (thnks to Digium), i am happy, but not at 100%, a lot of problems are here, some kernel fault even, some problem in the "diagnostic" part. I think the ISDN part of asterisk is very important, in Italy there is a lot of equipments that are ISDN and not ANALOGIC or PRI, and with no ISDN stable support it is impossibile to port asterisk on the real world. Wath i see now is that a lot of integrators are doing this: using external box to avoid at 100% the isdn problem in asterisk. Very bad, we go to use proprietary designed hardware and software, external components, more complexity, more point of failure. This is, for me, the hell. I am the only one searching a solution to the ISDN problem? Why develop a lot separate ISDN systems and not to concentrate all efforts on one or two? Why there is NOT a native isdn support on asterisk? why i must add a separate visdn misdn bristuff or capi component? Ciao.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
