If a wiki site about automobiles crashes, should I buy a horse? shadowym wrote:
>I'm curious what you think that agenda might be? > >If it is to push the perception of Asterisk as a solid alternative to >Traditional PBX's into the mainstream then I am guilty as charged! > >-----Original Message----- >From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:41 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] voip-info.org status update > >On Thursday 15 March 2007 12:32 am, shadowym wrote: > > >>Hard to expect the business community to take Asterisk seriously when >>this sort of stuff happens IMHO. I can't understand how 3 of 4 hard >>drives could just suddenly fail simultaneously. There must be more >>too it. No UPS? Someone spilled their coffee into it? Something! >> >> > >Obviously you didn't read Google's research paper on drive failures. And >aside from that, you're also obviously pushing an agenda with these >inciteful comments. > >- > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
