C F wrote:
I must say I have never run into a situation where I had low bandwidth, I always make sure there is at least 768k up, with a less than 150ms latency (not always have been able to meet the later, but never more than 250ms), so can't realy comment on this one.
*Ducks the items thrown after this one...* Don't ask why... For some reason I ended up with a client on a channelized T w/768 allocated for VoIP. They had an insane packet loss (sometimes 60%) which some level1 noc monkey told me was normal before I asked for his supervisor.... They averaged (not kidding) about 170ms and had about 40 Snoms... Why? I asked myself that daily... On notes of ftp... I wouldn't mind, its almost always the other side that gets all teary eyed "You want me to open a hole in my firewall!" (said the recent MCSE shlup)... ;) -- ==================================================== J. Oquendo http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743sil . infiltrated @ net http://www.infiltrated.net
The happiness of society is the end of government. John Adams
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
