Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/14/2007 7:41 AM: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:15:36AM -0400, Joe Acquisto wrote: >> Gordon Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: 4/14/2007 7:02 AM: >> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Joe Acquisto wrote: >> > >> >> A very simple question - what version is running? >> >> >> >> A CLI - show version does not tell me, only shows info about who >> >> compiled, and when. A google and other nefarious devices have not >> >> yielded the secret. >> > >> > Are you sure? >> > >> > I get: >> > >> > dsx*CLI> show version >> > Asterisk 1.2.16 built by root @ bob on a i686 running Linux on >> > 2007-03-05 07:25:25 UTC >> > ^^^^^^ >> > >> > Gordon >> >> Yes, *very* sure. Just did it again, to eliminate brain/time warps (well >> this time, anyway). >> >> Shows what you get, but the version number is missing after "Asterisk". >> Just a few spaces, then the rest. Perhaps the fault lies with those who >> complied it? > > SEems like you have a bogus version.h somewhere. >
this is it, I think: ------- tel1:/ # edit /usr/include/asterisk/version.h /* * version.h * Automatically generated */ #define ASTERISK_VERSION "" #define ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM ----------- > Next: is there any place on the binaries whre the SVN revision is > written? > I've no idea. > > Next-best thing would be to sart looking for differences in messages and > such from recent commits. > I've only this one version to check, at this time. > Tzafrir Cohen joe a. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
